machine learning

Natural data as found in biological signals or images is usually highly redundant and noisy. Classical models for the stochasticity in such processes break down in many such cases.

The signals of two emg electrodes attached to an arm plotted against each other. The arm was not moved during that time. Note how multiple outliers stand against a Gaussian assumption.

For example, due to the presence of edges in images, the gradients are giving rise to fat tailed distributions. On the other hand, it can easily be seen that multiple EMG signals are highly non-Gaussian.

In machine learning, we investigate methods for finding useful representations of natural data.

For this, we use parametric models which employ non-linear mappings. These are combined into deep and recurrent architectures which are subsequently optimized with classical and novel optimization techniques on a wide variety of objectives.

The objectives typically encourage the representations to fulfill some numerical criterion: sparsity, independence, clustering of similar items or the ability to reconstruct the input.

The models we use include but are not limited to Independent Components Analysis, Restricted Boltzmann Machines, Autoencoders, Deep Belief Networks and Recurrent Neural Networks.

A commonly used architecture for unsupervised feature extraction. Each input vector (blue) is mapped to a feature vector (white) via a linear mapping and a subsequent element-wise non-linearity.

 

 

Picture of  Justin Bayer

Justin Bayer

TUM: PhD candidate
time series learning
bayer.justingooglemailcom
Picture of  Christian Osendorfer

Christian Osendorfer

TUM: PhD candidate
unsupervised learning, deep networks
osendorfin.tumde
Picture of  Thomas Rückstiess

Thomas Rückstiess

TUM: PhD candidate
reinforcement learning and design
rueckstiin.tumde
Picture of  Patrick van der Smagt

Patrick van der Smagt

TUM: Director of BRML labs
smagtbrmlorg, +49 89 289-25793



2012

    Rückstieß T, Osendorfer C, Smagt P van der (2012). Minimizing Data Consumption with Sequential Online Feature Selection. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.
    Cordella F, Corato FD, Zollo L, Siciliano B, Smagt P van der (2012). Patient performace evaluation using kinect and Monte Carlo-based finger tracking. IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics

2011

    Rückstiess T, Osendorfer C, Smagt P van der (2011). Sequential feature selection for classification. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AI 2011
    Osendorfer C, Schlüter J, Schmidhuber J, Smagt P van der (2011). Unsupervised learning of low-level audio features for music similarity estimation. Workshop on Learning Architectures, Representations, and Optimization for Speech and Visual Information Processing, ICML 2011
    Bayer J, Osendorfer C, Smagt P van der (2011). Learning sequence neighbourhood metrics. NIPS 2011 Workshop Beyond Mahalanobis: Supervised Large-Scale Learning of Similarity

1994

    Smagt P van der (1994). Minimisation methods for training feed-forward networks. Neural Networks. 7 (1), 1--11.